Saturday, July 14, 2012
Wake up Call to Taxpayers
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Lights Out
When we regained power, I took the opportunity to change. I did not turn the TV on - I read a book. I also used my time to finish some craft and other projects. Things seem to be slower now that I have let go some of the creature comforts.
I thought it was amusing to listen to others complaining about the lack of things to do and how tough this was. I grew up before there was air conditioning for the masses; when TV went off the air at 6 on Saturday and I think it was not even on Sunday. The Grocery store also closed at 6 on Saturday and nothing much was open on Sunday - a few restaurants, maybe but busninesses were closed. Somehow we survived and had a really good time doing it. I am not saying let's go back in time, but I do think there are a few things to be learned from surviving the past.
Monday, March 12, 2012
Why Black History Month?
Friday, March 09, 2012
The Gym
- swings (wide bench seats for one) and lots of them. Nothing like stretching out in a swing to get height to your pendulous motion to work every leg and stomach muscle (not to mention arms) that you have.
- monkey bars (several sets to accommodate short, average and tall people) along with the climbing dome and a rock wall for those linear thinkers;
- the horsey ride (work those abs!).
- There could be dodge ball, volleyball, and of course badminton courts!
- What great playground does not have a pool? And, because we are adults, it would have a sauna and a hot tub!
- I wouldn't mind a sandbox either for some creative outlet.
- Let's add a line dance hall as well.
After a hard day at work, I'd rather go play. What about you?
Saturday, September 10, 2011
I Remember 9-11
Too Bad We Can't Talk About This
Glenn Meade really thrashes religion, specifically Catholicism, the Vatican and its role in promoting Christianity and tearing down religious barriers (something it has yet to do). He does this in his latest book, The Second Messiah.
This book revolves around the Catholic church, archeology, murder and keeping secrets. Archeology plays a prominent role in this story as does what may be seen as an unnatural alliance between the Mossad and the Vatican working together. There are also cliche scenes throughout reminiscent of Indiana Jones, but the dialogs and thoughts expressed via the thoughts of the main characters about archeology and religion are very thought provoking.
I attended Howard University in the early '70's. One day, my boyfriend who was an artist, took me on a tour of "America's Catholic Church" aka the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. We had a difference of opinion about the church. He thought it was a beautiful work of art. I thought it was an appalling display of opulence that was almost vulgar when I thought about all of the poor Catholics that put their last pennies in the offering so that someone could design a church like this with gold walls and ceilings and other expensive trappings. We argued about it for over a week. I agreed that it was beautiful, but was an example of why I thought the church in general was failing those it claimed to serve. A few years later I noticed a movement in mainstream religion that God did not want people to be poor and especially wanted the church to be an example of wealth so that folks would have something to emulate and would have leaders to represent them well. "You don't want pastor to be driving an old beat up car when he goes to visit the sick and shut in do you?" Was something I heard from the pulpit as deacons encouraged the congregation to donate a "love" offering for the pastor or to donate to the pastor's car fund, or clothing fund, etc.
I say all of this because Meade addresses just these issues and more in this book. Here you have an accidental pope who upon being sworn in tells the cardinals that he plans to open the Vatican to all, especially the secret archives and provide full financial disclosure. He plans to have no secrets, past nor future. He even forsakes the vestments and accommodations of the Vatican for a sparse room in an abbey. He wears modest monk wear. He wants to emulate Jesus as Jesus wanted the church to do. He is going to try to reach out to the other christian denominations and join the churches. As one cleric cries, "what next, reaching out to other religions?!?!". Maybe you can imagine what happens next, the mayhem that this stirs up.
Throughout this book there are some very interesting discussions about the role of the Catholic church, archeology, culture and life itself. Too bad we can't talk about them, but you can read them in The Second Messiah and form your own thoughts. Who knows, you may even break camp and talk about them.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
The Media's Responsibility
It never ceases to amaze me that whenever anyone mentions that the media may be at fault, they shriek that they (did not say, do, start it) just repeated what was said/done so that the people would know. I wonder if the people always need to know, and why the media no longer seems to be able to figure out what is really mentionable or newsworthy.
I had a lot to say when Imus spouted his words of wisdom. But here I will just dwell on my view of the media’s responsibility in it. My take on this is if a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Well we know it makes a sound, but if it does not have an audience, does it make a difference?
I don’t think it makes a difference until someone stumbles on it after the fall. At that time, maybe it has completely decomposed, or maybe it has become a safe haven for a variety of forest dwellers – large and small. But one thing for sure, it is no longer what it was before the fall.
So what does this have to do with the N-word, Imus, gangsta rap lyrics, etc? If the media did not amplify the sound so that all of the above was given an audience, where would it have been heard?
If the media had not continually repeated what Imus said, only that small population of Imus followers would have heard it. Since we really rarely hear much if anything from them or him usually, if the comment was contained or even ignored by the media at large, what power would it have?
What roll does the media play in supporting deviant behavior? If they did not popularize gangsta rap, would BLING be in the dictionary? Would bitch or ho be common terms in youth and younger adult language? Would young black males think that their life expectancy was less the age 21? Maybe for those who actually live the gangsta life, but for middle and upper middle class youth (and those with middle and upper middle class values) of all races should not even be aware of this life and should definitely not emulate it – but they do, thanks to the media.
There was a time when there were very few mainstream published black writers. Then self publication became popular and something else happened. We now have Connie Briscoe, Zane and Triple Crown. For a while, we only had Chester Himes and Donald Goines. Then Sister Souljah started the new wave of reality fiction readers. Now there is a tidal wave of baby mama drama and who did what to whom ghetto lore books.
Back in the day we called it blaxploitation, and although there was a lot of hoopla from the public about gangsta rap when it first came out, the media made sure that it was played enough to become mainstream, and to subliminally encrypt in the public mind that this is how black people live and think.
So what part of the blame belongs to the media? If they did not fan these issues then they would not become profitable. If these issues, behaviors, etc were not profitable, the proliferation of lifestyle, language, dress, etc, would lean toward something else – something that is profitable. Maybe that is where we come in by designing that which should be emulated.
I am not suggesting that we censure the media. I am saying that they are responsible for promoting negative behavior and presenting it frequently enough that people become immune to it and it becomes acceptable. They have a responsibility to the public to make sure that whatever then deem newsworthy is truly that. Also, that their role is to report that which is newsworthy, not to make news themselves.
If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? If the media has a mic planted in the woods, everyone hears the sound.
Monday, August 17, 2009
ENOUGH ALREADY!
I think that James Patterson and his protégés along with Michael Connelly are laughing themselves all the way to the bank. Actually, I think they just chuckle every time they get a notice that their royalty checks have hit. Their latest books are so much alike it’s ridiculous. Connelly attempts to use Patterson’s twisted psychotic outline for his latest book, Scarecrow. Patterson actually mentions Connelly in his book, Swimsuit (“At the time, I was an ex-cop turned mystery writer, but since my last book had gone almost straight from the shipping carton to the remainder racks, I was a third-strike novelist doing the next best thing to writing pulp fiction. I was reporting crime for the L. A. Times, which, on the upside, was hoe the highly successful novelist Michael Connelly got his start”) and appears to model his character on Connelly.
Connelly, on the other hand seems to want to be semi-autobiographical in his book, using a similar character, a soon to be dismissed writer for the L. A. Times who grasps his last assignment and turns it in to a new career, and a two-book deal so that he, too can leave the Times.
Another thread that loosely lashes both stories together is the demise of the newspaper industry as we know it. Technology has taken over. The online Blog and electronic quickly updated version of the paper is usurping the power of the print version, etc.
But getting back to the collusion theory, I sometimes watch the TV series Castle. This series revolves around a waning best selling novelist who has latched on to an opportunity to tag along with a real detective to learn what real police work is like so his next series of books (based in the detective) will be realistic. The connecting tissue here is that in a couple of episodes, Castle has a poker party at his house where he and Patterson, Connelly, Stephen J. Cannell, (all playing themselves) play poker and quickly give each other tips on writing. (Ka ching!!!! Ka ching!!!!)
Now I’m thinking that this new form of best seller production is sort of similar to the junk bond market or pyramid marketing, or predatory lending. Initially there is a great market for it, but once it becomes diluted, the bottom drops out of the market and a lot of folks will be finger pointing at the cause of the demise of reading. People will become bored with this cutesy form of old boy networking. They may actually become insulted by the lack of creativity being used to take their money. They may stop buying books.
Since the publishing industry is stoking this disaster, they will probably blame the gaming industry, the schools, the public and anyone but themselves for causing the death of reading as we know it, because they chose quantity over quality.
This is the type of greed that forces change. Assembly line production of books that are supposed to engage the reader does not work. The market becomes glutted and the consumer becomes sated. Now what? There is no anticipation. Although we sometimes wish our favorite author would write faster, we still want a well thought out, non-formulaic well written book.
Those of us who like a well crafted read may have to find alternative sources and venues. I see a market for self published e-books that can be downloaded to Kindle’s competitors for a price that mostly goes to the writer, a percentage going to the reader device producer. Why not Kindle? Because if it’s ties to Amazon. There has to be a cadre of lesser known writers who are producing well written police procedurals, murder mysteries, law and order books. We just have to support them.